Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte
The United Nations is certainly one hated organization, especially to those who see it for the NWO spearhead that it is. Last year, the Trump admin cut funding to the UN considerably.
Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley announced on Sunday a $285 million cut to the U.N. budget for the 2018-2019 fiscal year. The historic budget cut comes just days after 120 nations condemned President Donald Trump’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
While Trump has made no qualms about voicing his distaste for the UN, President Duterte has his own colorful means of keeping the NWO crocs at bay.
International Criminal Court
Enjoy the way he deals with meddlesome UN bureaucrats.
Rodrigo Duterte has once again harshly lashed out at UN human rights officials planning to probe alleged extrajudicial killings in his war on drugs, and claimed full responsibility for the “lawful” actions of law enforcers.
This latest vulgar outburst against the international human rights officials comes a day after UN High Commissioner Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein called for a “psychiatric evaluation” of the Philippines’ leader. On Saturday, Duterte again defended his and law enforcers’ rights not to cooperate with the UN-led probe into alleged abuses and extrajudicial killings in the country.
Calling Zeid a “stupid… son of a b**ch”, Duterte reiterated his authorization for law enforcement agencies not to answer questions from human rights investigators, currently being led by Agnes Callamard, the UN special rapporteur.
Duterte appears to almost be enjoying attacking the UN. This remark is a classic.
“Do not answer questions from them,” Duterte told soldiers in Zamboanga city, noting that he is taking “full responsibility” for his anti-drug campaign. “Just do your job … within the bounds of the law,” he said on Saturday, adding that the right to remain silent and not to bear witness against oneself is enshrined in the country’s constitution.
“Leave it to me. They are coming here. Do you have crocodiles here, the ones that really eat humans? Throw the sons of b**ches there,” Duterte stated, according to the Inquirer.
“These human rights [people] are dumb,” Duterte added. “I said [to drug syndicates] do not destroy my country, or my city for that matter, because I will kill you. And do not destroy… the youth of this land because I will kill you.”
This is a man who is clearly on a crusade to get rid of drug dealers. While his conduct remains a matter of great controversy, we in the US might have fewer drug problems if the Mexican government were to get a bit of Duterte in their backbones. Instead of the government running parts of Mexico, the drug cartels do. And we pay the price in our country.
And it’s not just drug dealers who Duterte is after. The nation has a sizable Muslim population, and a number of those are of the violent, jihadist, terrorist variety. He has declared war on the jihadists, and while that makes sense, he has even supported the bombing of Mosques.
The UN is going after Duterte while ignoring plenty of other national leaders who are engaged in far worse than what they allege Mr. Duterte is doing.
Source: RT, Inquirer.net, USNews
Image: Reporter.ph,
would have been much more interesting a piece to not focus on the rights or wrongs of the that president, but rather more of a humorous line, such as how many people would love to feed the UN to a bed of crocs, the UN is a bunch of crocs, etc
Thanks. Will keep in mind. The guy is clearly quite the character. It’s easier to see the angle one should take with some articles than others. Other than obviously never to say anything nice about a liberal, largely because there never is anything nice you can honestly say about a liberal.
Was meant to be a cathartic piece, I should have stated that. I changed it up a bit
Just remember that you will never offend me by making a comment like, “This article should be approached from ________________ angle.” Or, “Play out this ___________________” part of the story. I have read your piece on the interests and nature of our audience. But you still know them better and are very welcome to shoot me a couple of words if you think the desired approach is not obvious. Thanks! Craig