Feminism, in concept, is a just battle. Equal rights for women is an uncontroversial topic in 2016 — and is one that has been achieved for the most part over the past century.
There remains no distinctions between men and women in the eyes of the law, but that hasn’t stopped hardcore feminists from demanding change anyway. In the absence of actual legal disparities between the two sexes, however, feminists have now taken to demanding additional rights not afforded to men.
In at least one instance, this call for favoritism for women may be significantly lowering the standards of security that’s afforded to our country by our armed services.
While the military has long promised that the qualifications one must meet in order to serve in particular military roles will not be lowered to accommodate women, new reports suggest that this won’t be the case at all.
To see what changes they’re proposing, continue reading on the next page:
The Liberals and Democrats are complete i their entire lives destroying society and blaming everyone but themselves for the evilness they’ve generated.
Maybe the enemy will lower their standards when they see women on the front line. You think?
God didn’t make anyone. We are born from our mothers and fathers.
This Marine is very angry. Marines win wars. PC bs has no place in the Corps.
Neither sound stupid. If a woman meets the standards, she should be allowed to go regardless of her sex. You don’t discriminate half of the population because of sex. Sex is not a standard. Strength is. If you want your argument to make sense, your last statement should have been “A woman has just as much brute strength to engage in hand to hand combat as a man”.
As we knew…
Finally someone that speaks sense ^^^
There are weak men and strong women…only the strong survive!!! Obozo would have cried “mommy” in basic training!!!!
Of course!
Brilliant! Let’s further decimate our military.