Feminism, in concept, is a just battle. Equal rights for women is an uncontroversial topic in 2016 — and is one that has been achieved for the most part over the past century.
There remains no distinctions between men and women in the eyes of the law, but that hasn’t stopped hardcore feminists from demanding change anyway. In the absence of actual legal disparities between the two sexes, however, feminists have now taken to demanding additional rights not afforded to men.
In at least one instance, this call for favoritism for women may be significantly lowering the standards of security that’s afforded to our country by our armed services.
While the military has long promised that the qualifications one must meet in order to serve in particular military roles will not be lowered to accommodate women, new reports suggest that this won’t be the case at all.
To see what changes they’re proposing, continue reading on the next page:
You surely are kidding right? Okay, the women’s was lowered. The men were not. Where does that weaken the role of men in combat? Women have always been in combat but never give the role as combat so they didn’t get the same combat pay as the men did. It does not matter really what MOS they carry women have been and always will be going into combat with men but now some will carry the same MOS and get the same pay as the men.
This is just wrong
yep means they can’t carry thier own..and americans will die…to appease the stupid idiotic politically correct….muslims are going to love fucking these women before they kill them
Its a plan so they can roll out the robots when we get destroyed in battle.
So very wrong
I thought all the feminist say that women can do anything a man can do??
Very few women will be able to do what is required of an Infantryman. Just a fact,
r
Do you really think Obama cares if we have higher casualties?
you can also keep your doctors and you insurance prices want go up either. Just saying.