Democrats in California have wasted no time after the Supreme Court ruled that gay marriage is legal in all states to introduce legislation that takes everything to the next level.
California governor Jerry Brown has signed a bill replacing words ‘husband’ and ‘wife’ within state law with the word “spouse” to accommodate same-sex marriage.
I now pronounce you spouse and spouse?
SEE NEXT PAGE:
It should be the couples choice and only theirs
That’s wrong, the Bible said that a marriage is between a man and a women!
with everything going on in this country on its descent into hell one would think that the democraPs might have better issues to take care of once again proving how worthless they are
Never will I say those words
Why does government spend all there time on this c**p. Last time I looked we have a war and the economy is terrible. There are just a few things I think they should put as priorities.
If there is an email that you MUST read … This is it … Really
Now tell me what you think of our brilliant Supreme Court …..
And of course anyone is the chain of command that thought gay marriage was a good idea
They didn’t think this one through any better than they did the changes to Health Care
Welcome to the Marriage Mess
June 27, 2015 by Fr. Dwight Longenecker
So many are lamenting the immorality of the Supreme Court’s decision yesterday, but I can’t help seeing the idocy of it.
This is not only a grossly immoral decision but it is silly, short sighted and stupid.
Think about it for just a moment. The effect of this ruling is that anybody can marry anybody.
There are plenty of reasons why I might want to “marry” someone. If I am married we share health insurance and pension benefits. We share inheritance benefits. We can file a joint return and share tax benefits. We can also share other legal benefits that come with marriage. I can lodge a business or property in my spouse’s name. As long as I trust my “partner” why not marry them?
So, for example, two guys–let’s call them Randy and Andy–who are room mates can get married. They don’t have to have a big splashy gay wedding because they’re not actually gay. But they can now file a joint tax return and one guy who is maybe a student without health cover can get his buddy’s health care cover which extends to a spouse.
Randy and Andy don’t even have to live together. They can get all the financial and legal benefits of marriage while they live with their girlfriends.
Let’s be more creative. Janet and June are spinster sisters. They want to make sure the family home and wealth stays in the family, but they’re just sisters and even though they leave the property jointly in their wills to each other, the inheritance tax is greater than if they were married. So why shouldn’t June and Janet get married? They don’t want to have sex together, but they want to be married. They could head off to the JP and get married, and why not?
Would there be benefits for two guys who were partners in a business to get married? Legal experts will clarify, but from what I know, I think there would be considerable benefits in the business being owned by “husband” and “wife”.
The situation of Janet and June already happened in England and the women were told they could not marry. But why?
There is no real reason. Furthermore, a case in Pennsylvania came up recently in which an adopted son “married” his father. Two gay men wanted legal rights so one adopted the other when gay marriage was illegal and when gay marriage was possible they married each other. So go figure.
One is only limited by one’s imagination. Let’s say a man named Bob is divorced from a woman who was married before and he has a stepson named Billy from the relationship. Perhaps Bob wants to remain living with Billy and wants the boy to have legal rights. Why shouldn’t they get married once the boy is of age?
It get’s stranger. Let’s say Andy and Randy want to eventually marry their girlfriends. They’re already married. That’s okay. We have quick no fault divorce. Andy and Randy have taken advantage of being married. They can now get a divorce and marry their girlfriends if they want. Same with Bob and Billy. Maybe Bob meets someone else or Billy, once grown up, once to marry someone properly. They get a quick divorce and off they go.
Has anybody thought all of this through? There doesn’t seem to be evidence of it.
If they have thought it through how then will they stop such abuse of the law?
Will they have bedroom police to make sure the marriage has been consummated? How exactly do you define the consummation of a lesbian marriage? What particular action cons$#%&!@*utes the consummation of a $#%&!@*sexual marriage. Must we affirm in some way that $#%&!@* $#%&!@* has taken place?
it is more about doing away with free speech .
fcking morons
Sickening now is the time to stop these idiot democrats and take out county back
No @[100006374708734:2048:Alvin Skinner] By more ammo lol