There are lots of glaring differences between Liberals and Conservatives. One is that Conservatives believe in personal responsibility and the power of the individual to manage their life and to make something of themselves without the nanny government stepping in to take away an individual’s self-respect as they learn to manage their own life.
Another is that Conservatives believe in a system of rules and standards that maintain a peaceful and structured society. Liberals, on the other hand, believe that individuals are ruled by inner demons and outside influences that they cannot possibly overcome, and so we have cases where murderers are released from prison because they had a difficult childhood and cannot be expected to understand and abide by societal rules such as not killing other individuals, nor should they pay their debt to society because it is just not their fault.
Liberals also claim that any societal aberration is a syndrome or a disease rather than a behavioral disorder, and the result is children being raised in families where there is no accountability for unacceptable behavior, and no expectation that they should conduct themselves in a socially acceptable manner. It is a system that panders to the very worst of human nature, and Liberals even create government programs and facilities to “treat” these behaviors instead of laying down a clear law and making individuals abide by the rules in order to adapt to the larger culture and society. It is a crazy way to run society, but Liberal lawmakers are willing to break the law in order to pander to the out-of-control law breakers.
In this latest case, it is a Democrat lawmaker suggesting that we provide drug addicts with easier access to their drug of choice in a comfortable, legal and non-judgemental setting. How does this even make sense?
California lawmaker proposes bill to establish nation’s first legal drug-injection site, page 2:
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Bernie Sanders: Invited to The Vatican by The Pope’s aid, Monsignor Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo, to speak about a Moral Economy. Bernie’s 2014 income $200k Hillary: 2014 income on IRS form 1040 – $27 million. Invited to hedge funds, private fundraisers. Has pacs, superpacs, known corporate shill. Went to Donald Trump’s wedding “as his friend” ($$$$$) #NotQualified for a moral economy, progressive, or liberal
Bernie Sanders: min. wage $15 hr. Hillary: $12 hr. = aim low, fail lower when obstructed by GOP. CA and NY agree with Bernie’s JUDGMENT. No single parent anywhere should get $12 by 2022. Period. The end.
Bernie: universal healthcare for ALL, as a right, not a privilege. Hillary: strengthen Obamacare, which serves some = aim low, fail even lower when obstructed by GOP
Bernie: all public colleges and universities tuition-free, paid for with a tax on wall street speculation. Hillary: no tuition-free higher ed. wants “debt-free tuition” where broke families and teens still need to pay tuition. Barrier to entry = aim low, fail lower when obstructed
Bernie: make for-profit prisons illegal, abolish private prisons, demilitarize police. Hillary: accepted $130,000 in donations from prison lobbyists.
Bernie: bust up the biggest banks. Hillary: make it more expensive for banks to be very big. Everything else, OKAY!
Bernie: resurrect Glass-Steagall, separating commercial / investment banking. Hillary doesn’t think it’s necessary to go that far. After 70 years protecting Americans, Bill Clinton joined Republicans in repealing Glass-Steagall, then the 08′ recession and bank bailouts. Instead, Hillary wants to regulate shadow banking (offshore ‘shell accounts’ for much less impactful tax evaders) but no changes for the most impactful, recession-causing, market-crashing Citi, JPmorgan et. (punish small frys with offshore accounts but not banks. tax payers will bail them out!) aka “socialize the risk, privatize the profits” = aim low, fail lower when obstructed. Thanks Clinton’s!
Bernie: tax speculative trading on Wall Street. Hillary doesn’t think that’s necessary either. “knock it off you guys” handled it.
Bernie: credit rating agencies Moody’s, S&P, Fitch to be non-profit so they can’t lie with bogus ratings to win over Wall Street clients, like they did in the 07/08′ mortgage crisis. Hillary: GIVES paid speeches TO wall street and private equity firms for fundraising. $600,000 from Goldman Sachs in one year.
Bernie: Expand Social Security by raising the cap on income subject to the Social Security payroll tax. Hillary: nothing
Bernie: allow states to legalize marijuana and remove marijuana as a federally classified drug to help those affected most (minorities and ALL taxpayers paying for prisons). Hillary: put marijuana on a lower drug enforcement classification but doesn’t want it legalized = keep imprisoning blacks disproportionately. aim low, fail lower when obstructed
Bernie: progressive for 50 years. Hillary: “progressive” for 8 months (and it shows…)
We need safe zones from dem’s.
Big no
Safe zones for drug addicts? Okay I vote for their households first. Let us know how it goes, you bunch of morons.
Stupid fools. Support killing anyway they can..drugs doing great job of blk on blk killing..
Wake up..
do you have tests for insanity in your politicians?
They pour on crazy with a straight face
Give them all their safe zones. Then they won’t aggravate the rest of us so much.
I want you to create me a safe Zone away from people that have safe zones f****** idiots