The progressive habit of labeling every human quirk or behavioral predilection as a “disease” or a “disorder” often gives license to those who should modify their behavior, but instead explain it away as something they have no control over. It is not uncommon for someone with a hot temper to explain away their unacceptable outbursts with the explanation that they were just “born that way,” when in fact it is part of the human challenge to control our impulses and to “civilize” ourselves so that we meet the standards of a polite society.
There are times, however, when recognizing a “condition” may be necessary in order to manage it, whether we believe it is a true condition a person was “born” with, or simply an impulse that the person refuses to modify or stifle.
According to one criminal psychologist, paedophilia, or sexual attraction to children, is an “orientation” that child sexual abusers are born with, and cannot change. The proposition is offensive since it diminishes personal responsibility and would seem to classify the rape of a child along with the so-called ‘orientation’.
Is paedophilia controllable, page 2:
What crock of$#%&!@*.. No Normal person is programmed to find children sexually appealing..
What an asshat
Appears like the liberals in charge of advising us as to what is and isn’t devient and perverse behavior are again caving to political pressure just as they did when pressured by the homosexual lobby in order to mainstream more abhorrent behavior. Prior to this the behavior involved people who, in most cases, went into it with their eyes open and who knew what they are and the depth of their depravities. This turn of events, however, involves innocent children and their attempts to normalize this behavior may well end some careers and, hopefully, land some academics in the cells they so richly deserve.
NO !! It is NOT !!
Well I’m straig
BS
Not so.
Bestiality is next. The only thing that those specializing in animal husbandry have to convince us is that they know in what manner the amorous animal conveys consent (unless they can convince the ASPCA that consent is not needed which, given their rabid attitude concerning the rights of animals seems unlikely).
Must be careful with that medication. There’s always the danger of lead poisoning.
true. lol.