Florida’s Third District Court of Appeals has just made a landmark ruling that the Institute for Justice is calling “a major blow to property rights.”
Tom Carroll and Hermine Ricketts, 17-year homeowners, have been fighting the Village of Miami Shores for the last 6 years. The battle ended in a verdict after 3 years but they fought on. It all started back in 2014 when the couple refused to take the “advice” handed down to them by the town officials keen on implementing a new zoning plan.
The homeowners refused to relinquish their constitutionally protected rights. That is when town officials resorted to plan b.
The couple subsequently sued based on a constitutional infringement upon their right to use their own private property as well as a violation of the equal protection clause.
Head on over to the next page to learn about the decision just handed down by Florida’s Third District Court of Appeals in regards to property rights.
Thus can be corrected legislatively with rebranding under ways to meet sustainability goals.
Courts don’t have e the right to tell us we can or can’t grow veggies on our own property
What is wrong with you people? Why did you do this? More money for Big Pharma as most of what you buy in a grocery store is full of chemicals. Hmmm unhealthy…
illness and then more dollars are made by the drug companies.
Actually is this the truth?
Insanity!
Appeal or shut up
Stupid morons.
Ah, I thought it was the residents association being outraged. But I guess if residents associations have a right to restrict vegetable growing in front yards, then the city has done rights too. It isn’t like you can use it to dump cars on your front garden without the city taking an interest, is it? So they decided the visual effect of a vegetable garden was unacceptable.
Stupid. We need to take back the country from corrupt government.
Bull