Florida’s Third District Court of Appeals has just made a landmark ruling that the Institute for Justice is calling “a major blow to property rights.”
Tom Carroll and Hermine Ricketts, 17-year homeowners, have been fighting the Village of Miami Shores for the last 6 years. The battle ended in a verdict after 3 years but they fought on. It all started back in 2014 when the couple refused to take the “advice” handed down to them by the town officials keen on implementing a new zoning plan.
The homeowners refused to relinquish their constitutionally protected rights. That is when town officials resorted to plan b.
The couple subsequently sued based on a constitutional infringement upon their right to use their own private property as well as a violation of the equal protection clause.
Head on over to the next page to learn about the decision just handed down by Florida’s Third District Court of Appeals in regards to property rights.
Dave Langenhorst AMEN to that brother!
The court can kiss my$#%&!@* MY PROPERTY, MY CHOICE.
Bull s**t
B******T TRY AND STOP ME.
your debt slaves get over it. Since you lack the balls to defend your rights
makes sense, being self-sustaining doesnt contribute to tax-dollars or the commercial ag thieves(owned by political parasites), cuts into shareholder profits, etc.. almost makes more sense to grow a few gallows and hang some corporate sell-outs
You’ve got to be kidding! Such stupidity!
The CONCEPT of zoning laws in Constitutionally flawed.
The way I read it is they were growing veges before they had an HOA.
Yes, we do have that right.