In yet another example of liberals rejecting a clear Supreme Court decision that the 2nd Amendment really does mean that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, local governments keep “finding” loopholes to reject the court decision.
In this case, Connecticut Senate members declared that alleged domestic abusers must give up their guns and ammunition if their partners seek restraining orders. And it must be done on the thin fabric of an accusation, with no substantiating court ruling.
While several Senators and proponents of the bill tried to justify the action, it is quite simply unconstitutional.
See more on page 2:
Seems the idiots that elected these clowns are now getting what they voted for. Unfortunately a law student can get this thrown out in court. Contrary to their beliefs, you are innocent until proven guilty. I guess the shall not be infringed went out the window with the constitution and the bill of rights. Shameful.
f**k him
Thats b******t. anyone can claim your an abuser. has to be proven first.
Accused or convicted?
So if i kick some joes$#%&!@*for being a disrespectful thug or thief i lose my guns?……um no i dont think so.
shoot the assholes at the door
It’s coming. President Killary or trump will take the 2nd amendment away… Buy all the guns and ammunition u can..
Completely unConstitutional. No due process. Shall not be infringed. Can’t liberals read simple English?
Where is the due Process?
Accused and not convicted? Seriously wrong tere