In yet another example of liberals rejecting a clear Supreme Court decision that the 2nd Amendment really does mean that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, local governments keep “finding” loopholes to reject the court decision.
In this case, Connecticut Senate members declared that alleged domestic abusers must give up their guns and ammunition if their partners seek restraining orders. And it must be done on the thin fabric of an accusation, with no substantiating court ruling.
While several Senators and proponents of the bill tried to justify the action, it is quite simply unconstitutional.
See more on page 2:
Deane Milligan Doesnt matter all someone has to do is say you did .then they take it away till you prove otherwise . In Ca your neighbor has to do is say they think you a danger .they come and take your gun till you go to court to prove your not lol
Ok get ready Connecticut ur fixing to get ur aces sued off u can’t change the 2nd amendment
GOOKS RUN
And the gun grab begins
Oh, yeah, like that is going to help! That will be about as much help as restraint orders.
who this ugly$#%&!@*want to be @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@2
WAKE UP AMERICA!!! Pick your side.
Not sure that can stand up.
Their all idiot’s there anyways
Having worked in California, after the weapon is taken DOJ requires that you prove ownership. If you cant, they wont give it back, even if your exonerated from criminal charge. What is interesting is there is no law that requires you to prove ownership, just policy.