In yet another example of liberals rejecting a clear Supreme Court decision that the 2nd Amendment really does mean that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, local governments keep “finding” loopholes to reject the court decision.
In this case, Connecticut Senate members declared that alleged domestic abusers must give up their guns and ammunition if their partners seek restraining orders. And it must be done on the thin fabric of an accusation, with no substantiating court ruling.
While several Senators and proponents of the bill tried to justify the action, it is quite simply unconstitutional.
See more on page 2:
Must give means turn them in for safekeeping until the matter is adjudicated, not confiscated….
absolutely. correct….
an arrest is an accusation based on facts available at the time of arrest. More info (like dna?) can be obtained at a latter time that exonerates an “accused” person…..
Bad idea
This amounts to zero…
keep giving in to onama.
This is wrong! Someone needs to fight this! You think you are saving woman’s lives by doing this!! I’m a domestic violence survivor and my ex did not need a gun to harm me!! You idiots!!!
Vote them out of office repeal the law.
Insane. that is what this bill is. Connecticut you are so stupid.
Democrats like to give everything to the Chinese don’t