Although it is important that we question everything we read, it is just as important that we do not let the government control what we read.
Thanks to unprecedented advances in technology, people are able to access information at rates and levels that would have been unimaginable even a couple decades ago. We can store information that would have taken entire libraries to fill in times past on devices no bigger than our hands today, and transmit it faster than anyone could have dreamed of. This has made it possible for ordinary people to not just find news, but disseminate it as well.
The downside of this is that since everybody can share news, anybody can, leading to misleading and even outright false stories spreading. Even worse, this gives the busybodies in Washington a pretext to exert their control over alternative media.
Turn to the next page for more info:
Hey folks, these people work for us, remember that whole elected thing?
The progressives are on the march. Hope all of the comrades will stop aboit the f**e news. Because that’s all they are goong tp get…
Is it just me, or is this story ironic in that it seems to lack clarity as to whether it’s actually passed or not? Is it true, did it pass or didn’t it, it all just seems to be a convoluded mess.
So you’re ok with all the lefty outlets but complain about one that leans right?
Good I am in favor of scrutinizing disinformation and propaganda especially when it originates from foreign countries hostile to the USA.This article is an example of disinformation and propaganda, but this site usually is.
If we end up in 1984 after 2017 will it be considered time travel?
If signed, a court case will decide the constitutionality. Before today, you still were not allowed to lie. I would have been happy if editorial ism was simply labeled as such.
Actually I’m not entirely convinced that the new breed of journalists can spell and use proper grammar and punctuation anymore.
This is one of those f**e news stories
Sounds very dangerous!