President Obama has once again taken the side of foreigners over American citizens, this time in a speech that he gave recently which was designed to insult presidential candidate Donald Trump. In the wake of the Paris massacre by Muslim extremists and the murder of 14 people in San Bernardino by an Islamic husband and wife, many citizens are calling for a pause in the wave of immigrants being invited into the U.S. by Obama under a special refugee program.
Trump also has taken a position that is decidedly not politically correct and has called for a moratorium on allowing Muslims into the United States until the immigration department can tighten up the process to ensure that Islamic terror cell members are not sneaking in under the guise of being fleeing Syrian refugees.
Immigration officials have admitted that their vetting process is porous, and recent evidence shows that the San Bernardino woman who killed so many people was a radicalized Muslim well before she came to the U.S., but entered the country with little or no slow-down from immigration services.
The proposal by Trump is quite reasonable in that it is temporary and it is supported by the vast majority of Americans. But Obama, rather than recognizing the legitimate fears of U.S. citizens, chose to denounce Trump, and by extension, the public, calling them bigots, and citing freedom of religion as a superior value, though it is important to recognize that the right of freedom of religion only applies to U.S. citizens, not to foreign immigrants.
There are laws which do indicate that religion should not be a test for immigration, but the real point is that Trump is saying that the U.S. has a dangerous problem, and that it must be addressed before another tragedy occurs. That may simply be the halting of immigration from the Middle East, which would be legal, but that is up to Obama, and he seems determined to ignore the will of the people.
See video, page 2:
So wrng
Trump 2016.
This is not so much about Trump as it is about Obama.
Trump does have a point. All we have to do is look at the problems UK, Norway, ect are having with the muslim influx . . .
Why are some in this country so hellbent on committing cultural suicide?
Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam:
Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life. Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other components.
Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their religious privileges.
When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other components tend to creep in as
well..
Here’s how it works:
As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. It is a trick.
United States — Muslim 0..6%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1.8%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%
At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. This is
happening in:
Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%
From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.
For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamicstandards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims.They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply.
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law.
The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions.
In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam, with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections. FRANCE
After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues.
At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks,
From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels.
After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim. Everyone copy and post this!
God save us from “Professional Politicians”
AAll of congress and the senate need to be replaced.
No more presidents that do not adhere to the will of “THE PEOPLE” ffs.
Typical Obama! Glad when he will be gone !
Trey gowdy is the only one doing his job . lock up all the others for treason in the face of the enemy.
What a bunch of loosers