The small town of Nucla, Colorado, with a population of 750, passed the state’s first and only municipal ordinance in 2014 requiring heads of households to own guns and ammo, “in order to provide for and protect the safety, security and general welfare of the town and its inhabitants.”
“We more or less kind of wanted to give criminals a heads up. Stay out of this town. We’re armed,” stated board member Richard Craig.
Move on to the next page:
So they have a law telling people they must own a gun. How can that be constitutional?
Growing up in Iowa hunting is how you got by.
If every town had this and every or knew that every house had a gun !!! Would you think twice about breaking in ???
robbery and gun violence will be almost zero!
Now that’s American
works for me
What happened to spelling and grammar and logic?
This town may be the exception that proves the rule: the more guns, the more deaths by guns. Chicago, New York, Los Angeles, and so on.
Dentures are optional
Actually David, if you did the research, you’d find that fewer guns equals MORE gun deaths. The difference is that in the Cities you cite, the victims are almost always law abiding citizens, and the perps are almost always criminals who shouldn’t have guns in the first place. Try a little research, it’s good for the soul and prevents public embarrassment when you voice an unsupported opinion.
Care to post the credible research from actual peer reviewed, scholarly journals that proves the claim you’re making here?