Hillary Clinton clearly wasn’t prepared to lose Tuesday’s election.
Most political “experts” expected the election would be called shortly after the polls closed on the west coast. They said that Clinton was going to win and it wasn’t going to be particularly close. They couldn’t have been more wrong.
It ended up being a late night. Midnight came and went on the east coast with neither candidate declared the winner. But while neither candidate had yet reached 270 electoral votes, Donald Trump was almost assuredly going to win. At 2:31 ET, the Associated Press was the first major news network to make it official.
Moments after the call was made, the media turned their attention toward Clinton HQ. Instead of a concession, John Podesta dressed the crowd, saying that they’re hear from the campaign the following morning.
Now we may know why. Because Hillary Clinton wasn’t taking it well.
Read about her response on the next page:
SHE WAS TOO DRUNK
Boo hoo
God is over ALL !! her time to pay up !!” Be sure your sins will find you out ” !
What about herself??? Oh, she does no wrong, tells no lies has noone killed who crosses her………
Thank u
Poor little baby.
She should blame OBAMA no American with a brain wanted that bought and paid for$#%&!@*IN THE WHITEHOUSE. SHES JUST LIKE THAT MUSLIM BASTARD OBAMA
Maybe she should think about blaming herself:
March 10, 2015 press conference while Congress was awaiting Clinton’s production of her emails and word had come out about her personal server:
CLINTON: “I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email. There is no classified material. So I’m certainly well-aware of the classification requirements and did not send classified material.”
On January 22, 2009, Clinton signed a “Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement” in which she acknowledged “classified information is MARKED OR UNMARKED CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.” She also acknowledged that “I have received a security indoctrination concerning the nature and protection of classified information” and that “I have been advised that the unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention of NEGLIGENT HANDLING OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION BY ME COULD CAUSE DAMAGE OR IRREPARABLE INJURY TO THE UNITED STATES or could be used to advantage by a foreign nation.” “I understand that if I am UNCERTAIN ABOUT THE CLASSIFICATION STATUS OF INFORMATION, I am required to confirm from an authorized official that the information is unclassified.” She also signed, saying “I have been advised that any breach of this Agreement may result in the termination of any security clearances I hold.”
Now, Clinton said “Classified documents have a header that says it’s confidential.” and that she doesn’t recall receiving any training. BUT WAIT, in her nondisclosure agreement she acknowledged that classified information can be “marked or unmarked” and she acknowledged she had received an “indoctrination concerning the nature and protection of classified information.”
And this is what Comey had to say:
“110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.”
“It is also likely that there are other work-related e-mails that they did not produce to State and that we did not find elsewhere, and that are now gone because they deleted all e-mails they did not return to State, and the lawyers cleaned their devices in such a way as to preclude complete forensic recovery.”
“[S]even e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails). None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system.”
“But even if information is not marked ‘classified’ in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.”
Gowdy: Clinton said she didn’t receive classified information over her private email. Is that true?
Comey: No.
Gowdy: Clinton said she didn’t email any classified material. True?
Comey: No.
Gowdy: Clinton said she used one device. True?
Comey: She used multiple.
Gowdy: Clinton said all emails were returned to State Dept. True?
Comey: No.
Gowdy: Clinton says her lawyers read all the emails. True?
Comey: No.
This is what a State Department audit found:
“The audit says that none of the senior State Department officials in charge of information security were asked to approve Clinton’s email arrangement. They would not have done so if asked, they said, according to the audit. The audit says that some State Department officials tried to offer different solutions to Clinton’s email situation but were rebuffed. At one point, an official suggested Clinton carry two devices, but that suggestion was rejected. Two information technology officials who support the secretary raised concerns about Clinton’s use of personal email in late 2010 and raised the issue with their boss, the audit says. The director of the unit that supported the secretary’s information technology “instructed the staff never to speak of the Secretary’s personal email system again.” (New York Times)
But she DID give a concession speech and that should be the end of it!
Crybaby doesn’t like to loose