Gun control advocates such as Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton say they only want “common sense” laws that will decrease gun related injuries or deaths, but quite simply, they lie. They will also twist laws and and statutes in ways that have the same effect as outright confiscation by making it either too expensive or too restrictive for law-abiding citizens to buy and own guns for their own self-protection.
That is an outrage since it is not in the preview of any government official to suspend or diminish the constitutional rights of American citizens without cause.
The latest example of this tyrannical overreach comes from Lowell, Massachusetts where a new firearms policy has been put into place by the Police Superintendent William Taylor and the city council.
And of course, the policy will be impossible to remove unless city officials are either voted out of office or the citizens undertake a lengthy and expensive lawsuit to recover the rights they have through the 2nd amendment, the violation of which the superintendent and city council should be well aware of.
Policy makes gun ownership impossible, page 2:
A letter of recommendation would be The Constitution of the United States. The 2nd Amendment would be the letter of reference!
Going to loose that lawsuit when you get sued. Where do these idiots crawl out of?
What part of “Shall not be infringed upon” does this city not understand?
Sounds great, if you can’t read or write you shouldn’t own gun
must have gotten some blonde, uneducated,$#%&!@*elected
require same of residents if they want to stay in that city
Hand them a copy of the CONSTITUTION.
People really need to file a lawsuit against the city and all involved with this completely illegal attack on a unalienable RIGHT!
Our Constitution says nothing about citiys telling we cant, it says the US goverment can not not infringe on our guarante to freedom.
Did anyone fact check this?