Christian Baker Forced To Make Cake For Gay Couples – Update
Baker Jack Phillips was ordered by a judge last year to make cake for gay couples, which Phillips had refused to do because of his religious beliefs. Last month he filed an appeal.
The decision by the judge was reinforced by the Civil Rights Commission of Colorado – Phillips must now submit quarterly reports for two years to show how he’s changed his “discriminatory practices.”
“Any person doing business in Colorado has to recognize that they have to do business in an ethical and law abiding way and the law says you cannot discriminate,” stated Raju Jairam, vice chairman of the commission.
And what of our First Amendment law that says Phillips has free-speech rights and free-exercise rights?
The ACLU is involved in the case against Phillips: “We at the ACLU very much support religious freedom, but religious freedom doesn’t mean that somebody who has a business has the right to discriminate against members of the public who want to patronize the business,” stated Mark Silverstein from the American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado.
Where do you stand with the 1st Amendment rights of an individual as it might conflict with the discrimination of others?
Nearly two years after a same-sex couple was refused service at a Colorado cake shop, a civil rights panel on Friday deemed the act discrimination and ordered the owner to halt the practice.
The state’s seven-member Civil Rights Commission reinforced a December ruling from an administrative law judge who said Masterpiece Cakeshop owner Jack Phillips discriminated against Charlie Craig and David Mullins when he refused to make them a wedding cake because of religious objections.
In its decision, the panel required Phillips to submit quarterly reports for two years that show how he has worked to change discriminatory practices by altering company policies and training employees. Phillips also must disclose the names of any clients who are turned away.
“Any person doing business in Colorado has to recognize that they have to do business in an ethical and law abiding way and the law says you cannot discriminate,” said Raju Jairam, vice chairman of the commission.
Craig and Mullins filed charges of discrimination with the state’s Civil Rights Commission in July 2012 after they were turned away by the Lakewood baker while trying to buy a cake for a wedding reception.
Colorado law bans discrimination in a public place on grounds of sexual orientation, but Phillips has argued that forcing him to make wedding cakes for same-sex couples violates his right to First Amendment free-speech and freedom-of-religion rights.
Phillips and his attorney are considering an appeal to the Colorado Court of Appeals. He suggested on Friday that the rights of business owners with similar views were taken away by the commission.
Jack Phillips, owner of Masterpiece Cake in Lakewood, decorates a birthday cake Thursday, January 3, 2012. (Lindsay Pierce, Denver Post file photo)
“Not all of life is fair,” Phillips said said after the commission’s decision. “I will stand by my convictions until somebody shuts me down.”
Craig and Mullins said the panel’s decision validated everything they had been feeling. The couple said they have been inundated with support from people across the country since their story became public.
“When it came time to file the lawsuit we realized that this wasn’t just about us and they weren’t just supporting us as individuals,” Mullins said. “They were supporting the idea that gays shouldn’t be discriminated against in public accommodations. We felt like the best way we could honor what they had done for us was to follow this through. It hasn’t always been the easy road, but I believe we’ve been on the right one.”
In his December ruling, administrative law judge Robert N. Spencer said offering the same services to gay couples as it would heterosexual couples did not violate the cake shop owner’s right to free speech or prevent him from exercising his religion.
The judge ordered the cake shop owner to “cease and desist” from discriminating against same-sex couples. He said the fact that Colorado does not recognize same-sex marriage does not excuse discrimination based on sexual orientation. Colorado allows civil unions.
“At first blush, it may seem reasonable that a private business should be able to refuse service to anyone it chooses,” the judge wrote. “This view, however, fails to take into account the cost to society and the hurt caused to persons who are denied service simply because of who they are.”
Spencer said the cake shop owner’s argument “would allow a business that served all races to nonetheless refuse to serve an interracial couple because of the business owner’s bias against interracial marriage.”
The conservative Christian organization Alliance Defending Freedom appealed the ruling in January by arguing that the government was “attempting to force Jack to violate his sincerely held religious beliefs and to compel him to speak a message that is contrary to his actual beliefs.”
Nicolle Martin, attorney for Masterpiece Cakeshop, called the ruling disappointing.
He should close the businesses and reopen under a new name…make sure it is a corporation that way he doesn’t lose anything if sued. Companies do it all the time.
It sure is and just another right to our beliefs are removed. I believe that you as a private business owner should have the right to choose. After all those couples chose.
What B.S.! Leave Colorado and encourage other businesses to leave! They don’t like to lose those taxes! Your business should be your decision! Next time just say you’re booked or going on vacation. Apparently the truth isn’t what they want to hear.
This is total BS. The bakery doesn’t ban h**o customers. It refuses to bake a certain kind of cakes.
It’s like a publisher doesn’t have to print everything that is offered.
A newspaper doesn’t have to accept every kind of advertising simply because the ad submission happens to be legal. A newspaper can decide what kind of ads to accept and reject(even if it’s legal), Dildos are legal, but NY Times can reject d***o ads on its pages. Is that discrimination against sex toy industry?
If the bakery has a sign that says ‘no homos allowed’, that would be a problem. But the bakery simply refuses to celebrate ‘gay marriage’ which is an abomination and affront to true marriage.
It’s like a black baker has a right to refuse to bake a cake with a Confederate flag even though the flag is legal.
And an atheist baker has a right to not bake a cake with Crucifix if he finds it offensive.
Now, if an atheist baker put up a sign that says ‘no religious customers allowed’, that would be a problem. But he has the right to reject certain specific orders.
After all, the Nazi party is legal in the US. Does that mean a Jewish baker must bake a swastika cake if such is ordered? If bakers must bake ‘gay marriage’ cakes, then Jewish bakers should be forced to bake Swastika cakes.
He should close the businesses and reopen under a new name…make sure it is a corporation that way he doesn’t lose anything if sued. Companies do it all the time.
I would close my doors, and say screw you..and move to a state where they respect individuals and Christian beliefs.
I wouldn’t have done it I would have have put exlax in itr
OMG really what gives them the freakn right to say he has to bake for them….really throw my ass in jail…
That is bull$#%&!@*
It sure is and just another right to our beliefs are removed. I believe that you as a private business owner should have the right to choose. After all those couples chose.
This just a small action the Obama creeps will be taking from everybody.
It he is selling things he bought he would have to sell but you can’t force a house painter to paint your house why should he have to bake a cake
What B.S.! Leave Colorado and encourage other businesses to leave! They don’t like to lose those taxes! Your business should be your decision! Next time just say you’re booked or going on vacation. Apparently the truth isn’t what they want to hear.
This is total BS. The bakery doesn’t ban h**o customers. It refuses to bake a certain kind of cakes.
It’s like a publisher doesn’t have to print everything that is offered.
A newspaper doesn’t have to accept every kind of advertising simply because the ad submission happens to be legal. A newspaper can decide what kind of ads to accept and reject(even if it’s legal), Dildos are legal, but NY Times can reject d***o ads on its pages. Is that discrimination against sex toy industry?
If the bakery has a sign that says ‘no homos allowed’, that would be a problem. But the bakery simply refuses to celebrate ‘gay marriage’ which is an abomination and affront to true marriage.
It’s like a black baker has a right to refuse to bake a cake with a Confederate flag even though the flag is legal.
And an atheist baker has a right to not bake a cake with Crucifix if he finds it offensive.
Now, if an atheist baker put up a sign that says ‘no religious customers allowed’, that would be a problem. But he has the right to reject certain specific orders.
After all, the Nazi party is legal in the US. Does that mean a Jewish baker must bake a swastika cake if such is ordered? If bakers must bake ‘gay marriage’ cakes, then Jewish bakers should be forced to bake Swastika cakes.