“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
Absolutely!!
To bad it’s not true. I would love to see this
Impeach for Treason then he would not get anything he own all he has to the US tax payers.
There are so many Complicit Congressional Criminals and deep, deep supporting participants in offshore finance, think tanks and federal agencies, this will be nearly impossible to sanitize but TRUMP remains the best shot to start the process. A mindset of integrity and public service is so far removed from theft and personal wealth building by STEALING from The Public Trust will take years to build back into Our Nation.
Obama should be arrested for crimes against humanity. I pray we don’t have to go to war with Russia
And just like killery,,,, it’ll never happen they’ll skate and we’ll pay for them the recast of their lives
He’s in HAWAII,go Now!
Gitmo
What is stopping them from bringing down all the corruption. He is trying desperately to start a war.
Rick Cox David Breyer is correct. You’re being a total hypocrite about this. The right has been all bluster about how Obama should be tougher, but when Russia actually does something and Obama takes action, you’re all getting the vapors and worried about the repercussions.