“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
Lets Get this DONE!!!!
That I would like to see. Hillary right beside him, too.
Rick Cox that’s hilarious. You refuse to accept facts slapping you in the face like a…well like a ‘teabag’. This is from the hackers own website
https://guccifer2.wordpress.com/
This is from the smoking gun. They say it was the Russians
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/investigation/tracking-russian-hackers-638295
They have definitive proof. They aren’t showing it. Ever play football? You don’t show the other team your game plan when you’re winning at halftime.
Don’t be such a tool. Every single piece of “evidence” you posted, I shot down with link after link after link. Everything I posted you said “nuh uh I don’t believe it.” Grow up. Grow a pair. And come back after you’ve learned how to Google stuff.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIO-4v8qpYc
Lucinda Anderson I literally posted right above you facts about the generals retiring and being fired. The article specifically said that two of those generals may have been fired as you claimed. I literally partially agreed with what you said and presented facts to support your arguments. Did you even read it?? NO. Of course you didn’t. Because why would you be interested in facts. They might change your preconceived notion about Obama.
That’s how I know you are all idiots. I post things that confirm your arguments and you disagree with me anyway. Don’t you feel stupid?
I agree with you! No spine.
Ok. For the last 24 hours or so I’ve been asking for proof and links from the Conservatives on here to justify their opinions. Over 90% of you just laid down personal attacks. Calling me stupid. Ignorant. Sheep. Snowflake. Whatever. But here’s the funny part:
On not one, not two, but three separate occasions I posted links that either partially or fully supported the Conservative viewpoint. And on all three times I was called an imbecile, told to read and educate myself, learn history…all kinds of wonderful things. You all disagreed with me presenting you with supporting arguments. You have such hatred for liberals you have to argue with them, EVEN WHEN THEY ARE AGREEING WITH YOU!
And that, ladies and gentlemen, it’s what’s wrong with the world today. You saw my avatar and decided nothing I said or did was going to be truthful. You should all be ashamed of yourselves.
Treason
SHOULD HAVE ALREADY BEEN DONE YEARS AGO DO YOUR JOB
Yes yes. Yes!