“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
I soupourt this all the way
Go for it.
Obama has you delusional, like so many, you too have joined the willfully blind of Obamas cultists. All you really need do is open your eyes to see that he’s made a mess of this country and we will be fortunate if Trump can clean up the garbage condition that this ghetto trash punk has made in dividing this country’s people to a point that its totally dysfunctional. You’re a brainwashed moron, and its a glaring fact that you are one of the low, or no information voters that are a major part of this country’s problem. Yes, REALLY.
If anyone has an answer to this it would be Mr.Trey Goody. He would know…or he would know who would.
David Breyer ,there’s been occasions I’ve received before I give, but I’ll walk from this as well, pal, unscathed, first there’s no proof the Russians hacked anything, it’s called, (leaks) and obozo has no proof, even in the white house morning briefings Ernest had no answer dude,can’t reason with stupidity, stand tall, quit slouching. things will even get better for you dude.
Their afraid of being called racist so they won’t do a damn thing.
I would love it they do not deserve a pension or obomacare lol
Lies
I agree, he’s a good start.
There is but you will find nobody in Washington with the courage to do it