“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
David…..just because I hack a russian computer…it does not mean our Government did it…..dumb$#%&!@* And you can shove your allah up your$#%&!@*and go f$%^ a goat.
They wouldn’t even arrest Hillary and Bill….they won’t touch Obama and he is pretty confident in that. Our only hope is once he leaves office some really DAMNING evidence will surface and our NEW DOJ will step up and deliver the blows they ALL have coming to them!!
Yes !!!
If it was televised it’d be the highest TV viewers of the World, except maybe Killarys arrest
Arrest his$#%&!@* Obama is a terrorist-
Yea . Never will happen .
It would be the way to reward this debunked presidency
Then trump needs to be arrested
Fred Gollatz really? I’m the only one using facts and links to substantiate my argument. You certainly didn’t. You chose to corrupt the Word of God by pulling the Commandments out in a political discussion. Then you can’t even admit your boy violated Waaaaay more Commandments than Obama.
Wait….he’s the corrupt one? Not the ones that hacked and interfered? Republican logic 101.