“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
MaryLou von Wyl omg he’s like the worst Christian ever!!!
Proof or STFU
Don’t be nice. Be intelligent. Show proof and shut me up.
Yes it’s time
Well David Breyer, in looking at your comment’s, all I see is a void of any substance worthwhile. In fact, all you do is flap your gums with non issues that have no value whatsoever. Karen Pearson was just simply calling you for what you are. An annoying troll they should remain silent, and thought of a fool, rather than continuing to remove anyone’s doubt of that fact.
Still waiting …
Yep
Patty Miller it’s so funny. I agree with you yet you have to contradict yourself because Allah forbid you agree with me. Block away.
Colleen Garland
David Breyer ,www.redstate.com/…/regulations-kill-economies-obama’s-regulation-administration/