“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
Get it done
David Breyer , Hey, pay attention.toprightnews.com/boston-police-union-boycotts-obamas-labor-day-speech/
That would be a true blessing
He not a real president,remember he wasn’t born here,so anything he says is not legal
Throw away the key
Amen. send embto gitmo and throw away the key
Rick Cox OF COURSE they have evidence. They just haven’t told you because Rick Cox doesn’t need to know. Here’s your proof: 1st article is from Alex Jones and infowars saying that Guccifer 2.0 did the hacking.
http://www.infowars.com/guccifer-2-0-drops-clinton-foundation-documents/
The 2nd is Wikipedia (the easiest to read but there are others) stating that no less than 7 different independent cyber security firms have found that Guccifer 2.0 is a cover for two Russian hacking agencies.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guccifer_2.0
What more proof do you want than Alex Freaking Jones?
I wont this s o b shot by a fireing squad or hung
We the people demand satisfaction arrest that lying fraudulent Muslim traitior now!!!!!
Arrest him or shut the$#%&!@*up . Fuckin stupid$#%&!@*fucks