“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
Rick Cox a legit news site would NEVER use this as a headline against any sitting President
Impeach him then deport him to Russia
arrest him!
He should have been impeached and removed from office years ago! Think of the American and Syrian lives that would been saved! No refugee problem.
David Breyer , Do you understand the importance of what obozo is doing here, and watch ACLJ on what the traitor is doing too Israel,www.nytimes.com/2016/12/29/us/politics/russia-election-hacking-sanctions.html
obozo is doing this without any evidence of his imaginary hacking. man I could go on and on dude.
All talk has been for 7 1/2 years.
Do it!
Yup! What a pile!
Rick Cox do you understand that they interfered in our election process? Do you not get that??? All we heard for over a year is Obama is weak he’s not tough enough to stand up to Putin. NOW when we have proof that Russia compromised our Democratic process YOURE AFRAID OF RUSSIAN REPRECUSSIONS!! Sanctions against a country that hacks our systems are EXACTLY what is supposed to be done.
Of course you’re like Scut Farkas in A Christmas Story. You bully and talk a good game but when someone stands up to you, you take a beating like no ones business.