“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
Pamela Holt ?
Just wait people, it’s going to get much worse.
Name one corrupt thing he did
Karen York “all those generals?” You mean these guys?
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/dec/16/carly-fiorina/carly-fiorina-claims-military-generals-retired-ear/
Right now he would get biden to pardon him
stop talking and arrest obama now before he does any more harm to america……………………………
Jodi Pearson http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/may/22/facebook-posts/was-ronald-reagans-record-black-unemployment-bette/
Jodi Pearson https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/09/15/politics/donald-trump-obama-birther-united-states/index.html
Yes Yes Yes
Jodi Pearson for the record Jodi you’re the only Republican on here who I respect. You’re at least trying. Unfortunately memes aren’t proof and fairly easy to disprove. But please. I’m not being sarcastic or condescending when I say continue. I truly love a legitimate debate with an intellectual on the other side.