“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
Absolutely !!
David Crocker you’re aware it’s a Republican congress and has been for two full years? And they’ve done NOTHING.
Execute
He must be arrested for his many acts of treason during wartime and aiding the enemy…NOW folks! It is our military leaders sworn duty to arrest any and all traitors.
Doyle Conner Or is it because you have no proof to back up anything you say? I mean…if you’re going to post something, instead of calling me an idiot or saying I wouldn’t understand, grow some balls show me some proof and shut me up! Put it back in my fat face and give me a taste of my own$#%&!@*Pudding. If one of you – just one of you would quit the personal attacks and use Google I’d probably go away with my tail between my legs.
True and stop it from ever happening again
WOW! READ THE COMMENTS!!!!!
Lock him up.
Throw away the key….
They might need a new prison for all the corrupt Dems 🙂