“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
Obummer should be sent to prison for treason….period !
Amen !
Send obummer to prison for treason !
Amen !
We are like all the white Pussies in the world we won’t do anything, we’re weak, castrated, politically correct, few have what it takes to defend our Home Land from treachery. I’m sorry for those words but it appears to be true. Too bad for us.I’m guilty too.
This a big amen !!!!!!
Yes
Albert Dickinson wow, you are deep in the cognitive dissonance. You’re ‘certain’ Obama is a criminal, but you just can’t seem to articulate why you believe that.
Interesting you think you know what’s happening in MY brain, though. What qualifies you to make that kind of assessment? Do you have a PhD in Neuroscience? Because I do.
Just like Hillary, he will never face prosecution. It’s ridiculous.
Must drain the swamp….asap !