“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
Albert Dickinson you simply don’t have an answer. If you do, please educate us.
Do it now
Oh my god. Those people have been sitting there for 12 YEARS without being tried or told what their crimes are. Wow.
David Breyer , like I said, wet-brain, you’re Death , Dumb , and Blind, ignorance is bliss too followers , not Leaders.
Obama is a plant? What kind of plant? A flower? Broccoli, what?
It is a crime to threaten the life of the president. Be careful.
This is the only solution to the situation that he has put America and Israel in.
I can only wish
You all will get educated next year and im gonna be laughing my$#%&!@*off !!! You people that refuse to accept reality truly annoy me !!!
Yeah. By rounding up a bunch of billionaires who are sooooo concerned about the average working person. No swamp there.