“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
Here’s my proof
https://www.facebook.com/OccupyDemocrats/videos/1365007986925585/
That’s how it’s done by the way. Post a link that someone can go to so they can see for themselves. If you choose to ignore it, not watch it, or disagree with it that’s up to you. But that’s how you provide proof.
He hsould be arrested and ilmprisosned for the many crimes against America that he has committed.
My proof is that NONE of you can provide any links to your opinions. Prove me wrong. Own your opinion. Defend your stance. Or….STFU
Stop talking about it, and do it already.
Yea right
YES
Interesting!
God,I hope Russia be patient and wait until Trump gets in
It will never happen because our government officials are too corrupt and dishonest!