“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
If only……….
You are absolutely right about that, but with some small details, #1, people will not only remember that this ‘$#%&!@*’ was ”NOT” the right one for the job, but that he is & always will be a, ”LOWLIFE PEICE OF MUSLIM TERRORIST$#%&!@*” & a ”BACK STABBING COWARD CRIMINAL”.! #2 that ‘$#%&!@*’ was ”NEVER” a President, in order to be President, a person must have ”HONOR” & this ‘$#%&!@*’ does ”NOT” nor he never will have a shred of ”HONOR.!!!”
OBAMA= TREASON= DEATH
The Sargent of Arms needs to be arrested too, because he’s not doing his job. He’s probably in with the Obama group
It wouldn’t matter if I did ! The disease in your brain stops you from accepting anything that is beyond your realm of your safe space !!!
Just getter done already!
Wouldn’t that be something to see Old Huessein with his hands behind his back in handcuffs, I would have to snicker slightly
He deserves it..but…I won’t hold my breath
The actual CONTENTS of the emails are what is most important. It was an unsecured private server that was so poor on security that almost anyone could have hacked it. They used a private server to get around the Freedom of Information Act. The level of corruption is staggering. That is by far the greater issue.
I’m on deck for this I’m all for it, so make this picture real instead of a bunch of BS