“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
Now arrest him and put on trial for treason
Dumb$#%&!@*liberals,when they’re forced to face facts and have no other defense they ALWAYS play the race card even though throughout history Democrats have always been the Racist. They created the KKK and voted 100% against Emancipation. Democrats care about blacks every four years when they need their vote period.
He aint gonna do a thing , he has his orders an has never done a thing
Needs to happen!
Hang em high
Lock him up!
No one has the balls to nail Hillary, let alone impeach this waste of flesh
Exactly both Bushes have and both Clintons should be included, however this is about right now.
Pat Nice actually if you go further down you’ll see the ONE person who provided proof and links I ended up agreeing with. All I’m asking here is for 1) these opinions to be justified with proof and facts and 2) that proof and facts be supported by links. Is that too much to ask? For a call for the arrest of a sitting government official to be backed up by evidence? Is it really???
Treason-?…..