“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
I know people in the military that have said this as well …started cutting back a few years ago
Deborah Dee Smith you do care about skin color. That’s why you’re making wild accusations about men and women you don’t know. You have no proof and no evidence to back up your theory. None. Zero. It’s just your opinion and it’s based on skin color.
Just do it
Arrest the traitor before he starts a war he is doing every thing he can to destroy America.
That actually NEEDS to happen.
please arest him NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! why has he not been arested allready!!
Hell yes
I agree!
Mathew Marshall let’s pretend you are correct. Why hasn’t the Republican congress,which has been in control since 2014 done ANYTHING against him except sit on their hands and refuse to vote? Don’t say because they’re all in on it because that means we need to arrest ALL of them. Not just Obama and that’s never been discussed here. It’s all Obama Obama Obama. If it’s because they’re afraid because he’s black, like some here say, then they are being derelict in their duties in letting a criminal go free and need to be voted out of office and locked up.
You don’t get it both ways. You don’t get to call for an arrest for treason without also locking up the Republican controlled Congress that’s allowed him to stay without any repercussions
Traitor