The United States is a wonderful country, with freedoms and rights unimaginable in most of the rest of the world. Our free enterprise system also allows anyone to start a business and run it as they see fit, though the government is becoming more and more intrusive in dictating various requirements and policies. But for the most part, a business owners main objective is to provide excellent service and to meet the needs and wants of customers, and to keep them happy. Occasionally, however, a customer is too demanding or unreasonable, and the business owner must take action in order to ensure that the one customer does not disrupt his business to the detriment of all the other customers.
In Oklahoma City, a U.S. Army reservist from Tulsa went to the Save Yourself Survival and Tactical Gun Range in the small town of Oktaha. Raja’ee Fatihah, is a board member with the Muslim advocacy group Council on American-Islamic Relations Oklahoma chapter (CAIR). He identified himself as a Muslim, and had gone to the range because of a sign posted on the business declaring the range a “Muslim-free” establishment, similar to signs that have been placed at businesses in Florida, Arkansas, Kentucky and New York.
Fatihah undoubtedly was more interested in confronting the owners about their sign than he was about using the range. Chad Neal, the owner of the Oklahoma gun range, is no doubt anxious to run a successful business and to keep his customers happy. There are many Americans who are very concerned about potential Islamic terrorist activities, especially following the attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, where scores of innocent, unsuspecting people were murdered by Muslim extremists.
Muslim groups have also threatened people across the world that they will seek out opportunities to commit more atrocities against civilians. So Chad Neal, like any responsible business owner, is concerned about the health, welfare, and security of his customers, something that is top priority in a business where people are handling firearms. And that is why he posted the sign. But Fatihah was unhappy and looking for a conflict.
See legal issues on conflict, page 2:
It is time to make the ones who file and then lose such frivolous lawsuits pay court costs and damages. That would put the brake on ACLU and related organizations.
Ranges may need to start incorporating as private clubs, not open to the public.
A poll of Muslims living in here in the USA was conducted in June 2015 by The Center for Security Policy. It revealed a shockiing 51% favor sharia law over our Constitution. Another 25% believe violence is justified to punish anyone who offends Islam. In addition, almost 20% believe violence is justified to force adoption of sharia law here in the USA. The Pew Reasearch Center estimates there are now 3 million Muslims living in the USA. This translates to rougly half a million Muslims who believe violence (possibley terrorism or murder) is justified in order to make sharia the law of the land here. In addition to ourlawing sharia, all Muslims should be advised we here have first amendement rights to speak out and Muslims may be critisized because their belief in sharia is barbari/unfair to women. Any associated violence on the part of Muslim’s will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
tough sh$t
Shocking. cair and aclu have joined forces. No surprise. both are anti-American. I want to file charges against cair for violating womens rights. Also, aclu for violating rights of Christians. Imagine, a group so against the rights of Christians and they help muslims.
Tim Philpot Wrong. But you never have been one to stand with Americans.
he got told to leave after he ran his mouth and im betting its on video and if it is his lawsuit wont be worth a s**t
they should be allowed to attend our shooting ranges and pose as targets!!!
We don’t need ACLU, and never did.
You Muslims want to practice rifle shooting Syria Iraq are looking and I ran out looking for a few good men chance all a chickenshit are coming over here man up and go home