Something must be very wrong in America for our justice system to call people who commit crime victims and people who are victimized by crime criminals.
It sounds ludicrous, but a case out of Portland shows that the courts are amenable to such blatant nonsense. This is what Dunkirk resident David McLaughlin learned almost certainly to his chagrin when he found himself charged and convicted by such a court.
McLaughlin was minding his own business when he discovered that someone had broken into his garage. The intruder, David A. Bailey, had entered McLaughlin’s home with intent to make off with some of his property, as authorities later confirmed.
Doing what anyone would do when they find a potentially-dangerous intruder in their home, McLaughlin grabbed his gun and fixed it on Bailey. Realizing his mistake, Bailey attempted to flee the scene, but not before McLaughlin shot him in the arm.
Despite clearly being in the wrong, Bailey thinks he’s the victim. So much so, that he has taken McLaughlin to court for shooting him!
Learn more on the next page:
Shoot….center mass, three rounds, rapid fire.No one left to argue about it.
Empty the magazine into his dumbass…dead men tell no tales….
I guess he needed to finish the job…? But then the family could sue you.
That is precisely why you better shoot to kill and make sure there is no pulse. A wounded rattlesnake will snap back and bite you. Kill it!
any judge who rules for the burgglar should be disbared and removed from the bench
Kill them, one and all. Dead burglars tell no tales…
They should give this theif life for not fessing up to his guilt, you honestly think an$#%&!@*like this is redeemable?
Shoot to kill dead people don’t sue.
Robbins Virginia when he breaks into your house and kills you because he wants no witness should we have compassion then, if he breaks into my house he’s not leaving breathing.
This should not even be allowed in court. If you break the law, you deserve what you get.