Something must be very wrong in America for our justice system to call people who commit crime victims and people who are victimized by crime criminals.
It sounds ludicrous, but a case out of Portland shows that the courts are amenable to such blatant nonsense. This is what Dunkirk resident David McLaughlin learned almost certainly to his chagrin when he found himself charged and convicted by such a court.
McLaughlin was minding his own business when he discovered that someone had broken into his garage. The intruder, David A. Bailey, had entered McLaughlin’s home with intent to make off with some of his property, as authorities later confirmed.
Doing what anyone would do when they find a potentially-dangerous intruder in their home, McLaughlin grabbed his gun and fixed it on Bailey. Realizing his mistake, Bailey attempted to flee the scene, but not before McLaughlin shot him in the arm.
Despite clearly being in the wrong, Bailey thinks he’s the victim. So much so, that he has taken McLaughlin to court for shooting him!
Learn more on the next page:
He should of killed that loser !
SHOULD HAVE KILLED THE MOTHER FUCKER TO START WITH,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Only the Police are allowed to shoot people in the back and get away with it.
A round into the throat would have finished the job…!
No, their should be no jury that would agree with them, better yet the judges should not allow a frivolous lawsuits on the court dockets!
and the countersuit, felony and also civil lawsuits for attempted murder, breaking and entering, reckless endangerment, pain and anguish of forcing a life and death situation.
First Mistake was, Should have Killed Him !!
Best to make sure they’re dead.
It should never happen.
This has to be a joke….at least, I hope it is!