Something must be very wrong in America for our justice system to call people who commit crime victims and people who are victimized by crime criminals.
It sounds ludicrous, but a case out of Portland shows that the courts are amenable to such blatant nonsense. This is what Dunkirk resident David McLaughlin learned almost certainly to his chagrin when he found himself charged and convicted by such a court.
McLaughlin was minding his own business when he discovered that someone had broken into his garage. The intruder, David A. Bailey, had entered McLaughlin’s home with intent to make off with some of his property, as authorities later confirmed.
Doing what anyone would do when they find a potentially-dangerous intruder in their home, McLaughlin grabbed his gun and fixed it on Bailey. Realizing his mistake, Bailey attempted to flee the scene, but not before McLaughlin shot him in the arm.
Despite clearly being in the wrong, Bailey thinks he’s the victim. So much so, that he has taken McLaughlin to court for shooting him!
Learn more on the next page:
Perhaps if he were at work or at home watching his TV, he might not have gotten shot. If a judge hears this case, he or she needs to pay the taxpayer’s cost of this trial!
Shoot him again
Dunn
Dear Home owner, next time aim better!
Too bad he’s not dead!!!!
Homeowner should counter sue for damages from the mess and cost of rounds! Just sayin’… What a jackass!
you break in my home you wont live to sue me
Should have killed him !!!!!! Crime is a high-risk Business… Dumb bastard !!!!!!!
The moral of the story is to kill the SOB, if you don’t he (they) will become the worst witness at your trial ! If you don’t you probably will not ever get as far as a trial, you will be 6 feet under and the SOB will be enjoying
If the dumbass hadn’t been trying to rob this man he wouldn’t have gotten shot in the first place!