European leader’s refusal to negotiate the Paris Accord has left many environmentalists with misguided anger.
President Trump is no more at fault for leaving the Paris Accord than hypocritical European leaders. Moving to re-negotiate terms made under former President Obama was a very reasonable and precedent request.
Why would European leaders rather let the Earth be destroyed by President Trump than negotiate a smaller U.S. handout to save the planet? If global warming is true then any deal negotiated would still serve to benefit the planet, right.
It is no secret President Trump is not a part of the mainstream political establishments. But, is not being a part of the establishment enough to incite the wrath of the left?
In times like these it is extremely important to ask objective questions:
1) Why is President Trump the “villain”?
2) Why do European leaders hold no responsibility in this narrative?
3) Do global warming advocates actually believe their science?
There are numerous logical fallacies associated with the narratives peddled by mainstream media in connection to the Paris Accord.
More information available on the next page on what’s really going on with global warming and the Paris Accord
I’d have to drik my whiskey straight up instead of on the rocks
Toomsny pop ups in thi sight goodbye
What if a meteor hit the earth?
what if all the nuclear war heads were to explode at the same time?
Over the past 16,000 years, most of the ice DID melt.
Than I guess you better learn to swim.
Like your brain did?
What if s do not count. What if the sky falls? What if earth rotates off its axis/off course.? You can not play what if……concentrate on reality, on what IS HAPPENING. The climate has been changing since the beginning of time…WORRY WHEN IT STOPS CHANGING AND IS THE SAME THE WORLD OVER..c.
It’s been proven, we have same amount of ice as 50 years ago, so ice is not melting and their is no button or switch to prevent it any way, men can not control this!
Bill, go have another drink