European leader’s refusal to negotiate the Paris Accord has left many environmentalists with misguided anger.
President Trump is no more at fault for leaving the Paris Accord than hypocritical European leaders. Moving to re-negotiate terms made under former President Obama was a very reasonable and precedent request.
Why would European leaders rather let the Earth be destroyed by President Trump than negotiate a smaller U.S. handout to save the planet? If global warming is true then any deal negotiated would still serve to benefit the planet, right.
It is no secret President Trump is not a part of the mainstream political establishments. But, is not being a part of the establishment enough to incite the wrath of the left?
In times like these it is extremely important to ask objective questions:
1) Why is President Trump the “villain”?
2) Why do European leaders hold no responsibility in this narrative?
3) Do global warming advocates actually believe their science?
There are numerous logical fallacies associated with the narratives peddled by mainstream media in connection to the Paris Accord.
More information available on the next page on what’s really going on with global warming and the Paris Accord
What if you told the truth about a subject you know
what if there was chocolate air
More proof that ( you can not fix stupid)
If all the ice melted we would have less land so how are they going to stop it? They can not so why pay these people to talk?
So … that’s the question?
“What if all the ice in the world were to melt?”
Answer:
The people making & selling ice would get very rich?
What if all the ice in the world does not melt, they say scientists say that the ice cap has grown again What if you jumped in the lake Bill Nye
What if the sun turned off? What if all the oxygen disappeared? What if I had a$#%&!@*with Jennifer Love Hewitt and Salma Hayek?
He is not a scientist. Nye only played one on TV.
We would not have ice cream.
So what.