European leader’s refusal to negotiate the Paris Accord has left many environmentalists with misguided anger.
President Trump is no more at fault for leaving the Paris Accord than hypocritical European leaders. Moving to re-negotiate terms made under former President Obama was a very reasonable and precedent request.
Why would European leaders rather let the Earth be destroyed by President Trump than negotiate a smaller U.S. handout to save the planet? If global warming is true then any deal negotiated would still serve to benefit the planet, right.
It is no secret President Trump is not a part of the mainstream political establishments. But, is not being a part of the establishment enough to incite the wrath of the left?
In times like these it is extremely important to ask objective questions:
1) Why is President Trump the “villain”?
2) Why do European leaders hold no responsibility in this narrative?
3) Do global warming advocates actually believe their science?
There are numerous logical fallacies associated with the narratives peddled by mainstream media in connection to the Paris Accord.
More information available on the next page on what’s really going on with global warming and the Paris Accord
I wouldn’t want Bill Nye around any child. He’s a nut. https://www.facebook.com/theactivistmommy/videos/1265077313610415/?hc_ref=OTHER
Dumbass
Gosh my vodka tonic wouldn’t be the same.
Typical idiot
“What if a giant comet hits the earth and smashes It all to pieces? Will you still think
Capitalism was a good idea?”
We would have to make more, I like ice in my ice tea.
All BS. Ain’t gonna happen.
If a frog had wings it wouldn’t bump his$#%&!@*so much. If isn’t a fact.
And what if pigs could fly? Now that would be something even the Science Guy couldn’t explain!
What if all the Liberals committed suicide what a great world it would be