European leader’s refusal to negotiate the Paris Accord has left many environmentalists with misguided anger.
President Trump is no more at fault for leaving the Paris Accord than hypocritical European leaders. Moving to re-negotiate terms made under former President Obama was a very reasonable and precedent request.
Why would European leaders rather let the Earth be destroyed by President Trump than negotiate a smaller U.S. handout to save the planet? If global warming is true then any deal negotiated would still serve to benefit the planet, right.
It is no secret President Trump is not a part of the mainstream political establishments. But, is not being a part of the establishment enough to incite the wrath of the left?
In times like these it is extremely important to ask objective questions:
1) Why is President Trump the “villain”?
2) Why do European leaders hold no responsibility in this narrative?
3) Do global warming advocates actually believe their science?
There are numerous logical fallacies associated with the narratives peddled by mainstream media in connection to the Paris Accord.
More information available on the next page on what’s really going on with global warming and the Paris Accord
What if korea launched a ibm?
What if all the lead in the world would go threw your head dumbass?
Haven’t developed a taste for hot Coke.
What if aliens from outer space blasted us with photon weapons?
Yes climate change, something sensible people call seasons…..
Sounds good to me
I can prove you’re wrong in 2 minutes
What if all the water in the world froze? The earths inhabitants would adapt or die. Just like they have since life began on this earth. So whats your point?
Yeah there’s your global warming, liberals are bringing hell to earth….
What if you did !