European leader’s refusal to negotiate the Paris Accord has left many environmentalists with misguided anger.
President Trump is no more at fault for leaving the Paris Accord than hypocritical European leaders. Moving to re-negotiate terms made under former President Obama was a very reasonable and precedent request.
Why would European leaders rather let the Earth be destroyed by President Trump than negotiate a smaller U.S. handout to save the planet? If global warming is true then any deal negotiated would still serve to benefit the planet, right.
It is no secret President Trump is not a part of the mainstream political establishments. But, is not being a part of the establishment enough to incite the wrath of the left?
In times like these it is extremely important to ask objective questions:
1) Why is President Trump the “villain”?
2) Why do European leaders hold no responsibility in this narrative?
3) Do global warming advocates actually believe their science?
There are numerous logical fallacies associated with the narratives peddled by mainstream media in connection to the Paris Accord.
More information available on the next page on what’s really going on with global warming and the Paris Accord
What if scientists told the truth?
And?
Did they ever think that maybe the poles weren’t supposed to be frozen and maybe them melting is saving all of mankind and all life on Earth?
Mankind has absolutely nothing to do with the evolution of the planet Earth that belongs to God and the cosmos I’m sick to death of people acting like they’re so important they control what happens to the planet….
We would have a lot of water
No global warming since 1998 check this fact out on my page.science$#%&!@*
What if Nye was actually a scientist? Oh yeah, he is just a leftist mouthpiece….
What if liberals began to think?
What if your little bow tie fell off, tired of what iffs
What if you had a brain