European leader’s refusal to negotiate with President Trump has reignited a national discussion on global warming. The media sells a very harsh narrative. There is one way to view things and those who object risk being denounced as traitors.
Objective questioning and willfully ignoring truth are two very different concepts.
In times like these, it is extremely important to objectively answer questions surrounding the global warming.
President Trump refused to fund global warming. That hurts their pocketbooks and makes President Trump a formidable enemy of the left.
Now why is the left pushing it this much? Because they want an excuse to regulate industries throughout the world. They want an excuse for global planning, and in effect for socialism.
One of the core demands of the climate change advocates, the greens, is that a massive fund be created to compensate 3rd world countries for the fact they can’t have the same development trajectory that the 1st and 2nd world did because of constraints on carbon emissions because they can’t pollute up the atmosphere like the U.S, Europe. or Russia did as they were coming up industrially, they are entitled to compensation.
And this compensation goes right into the pockets of 3rd world dictators and their Swiss bank accounts. Hillary pledged to donate a 1 billion to the fund.
Liberal European leaders refused to negotiate with President Trump. They would have been open to negotiating if their motives were humanitarian and thought the world would destruct by the U.S. refusing to fund elusive global initiatives.
But, instead, it’s just fear mongering. The science behind global warming is dubious at best. Yes, human activity does influence the environment. Yes, mankind needs to be good stewards of the planet. Yet the “science” presented by the left purposefully emits key components. This is done to deceive people into believing global warming is a serious problem.
Move to the last page for the video and conclusion:
The oceans levels would drop, ice has more volume then water…