Another less obvious but more insidious aspect of wireless sterilization implants is the potential for human tracking and monitoring. The U.S. government has already demonstrated an uncontrollable desire to monitor its own citizens via cell phone metadata, intrusive TSA inspections and even warrant-less snooping by the FBI and local law-enforcement. If the pregnancy-Gates are implanted in a large percentage of the female population, as Gates seems eager to achieve, it’s almost a given that the government would pounce on the opportunity to monitor and track women by their wireless chip transmissions.
TWCN Tech News explained some of the details of the microchip implant:
The birth control chip is the brain child of a professor, Robert Langer, from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Bill Gates and Melinda foundation has funded the research and the prototype is ready for human testing. The chips will be ready for sale by the year 2018 according to Robert Langer. The institute’s Chip Foundation and Bill Gates’ foundation have been working on the birth control chip for past three years.
The chip’s size is 20mm by 20mm by 7mm. The reservoirs of hormones would be stored on a microchip of 1.5cm. The chip’s data would always be encrypted so that others (cybercriminals or hackers) cannot access the information contained in the chip or misuse/alter or destroy it.
[…]The release of hormones will be done by melting a part of solid hormonal stock using a small electric shock which won’t be noticed by humans.
[…]The safety tests would begin by the end of year 2015 and Robert Langer is confident that the chips will hit market sometime in 2018.
Well, TWCN reports the chips are encrypted. That’s a relief! That means they are totally immune to malicious hackers, right? No hidden ‘backdoor’ access into the chip or wireless access makes it possible for governments to decide to shut off or turn on an individual woman’s fertility or to control fertility on a broader basis, right?
Maybe the world is better off taking approaches that are not implicitly exposed to abuse or error, especially when the consequences are so potentially serious.
Maybe humanity should critically question the wisdom of opting in to a remote-control pregnancy switch funded by an elite depopulation enthusiast.
Sources: Natural News, TWCN Tech News
H/T: DCClothesline
Photo: Joi Ito on Flickr, TWCN Tech News
He has daughters I think. He has a very controlling woman I guess. They should launch the global campaign with the women in this creepy and evil man.
I’m tracked by what is known as a Loop Recorder. It’s been surgically inserted just under my breast. I have a wireless monitor placed near my bed and it updates the readings stored in the Loop Recorder when I’m in bed. The Loop Recorder stays in place for 3 years and then is surgically removed which is due to happen in November 2021. I’ve seen my cardiologist every year for check ups. While my heart is being checked and monitored 24/7 it will raise an alarm to the central control person, (whom I met at my consultation & when it was being inserted at the hospital). I have fortunately never been contacted because my heart was playing up, but if it had, depending on the severity, the monitor could send an ambulance plus the control person would make a phone call to me or my emergency contact. The only time I was contacted was when the monitor near my bed was turned off at the wall and the battery was flat. I didn’t realize until I received the call and had to reboot it.
So, I tell you this story because what is being explained in this technology is not as far fetched as you might think.
The old way of tracking a person with heart problems was a external monitor you wore for 48 or 72 hours and carried on you via straps and leads. These leads usually didn’t give accurate non stop recordings because they easily came off unnoticed.
Inserting a small chip with the capability of releasing contraception is very convincing but at what cost if it goes wrong or can be controlled externally by perhaps a government department?
Medical ethics is a MUST in this situation. The mind boggles at the thought that, using the same prototype, ‘they’ could euthanize people when they turned a certain age, or they became I’ll or infected with a virus and ‘they’ needed to control the spread so you were tracked and taken into ‘care’ or worse????? Nothing is impossible any more. Get Smart spoke through his telephone show and we thought ‘that is silly, there’s no cord’ Now we have wifi and wrist watches, GPS fall detector alarms for the elderly and so much more!
For the good of humanity OR for CONTROL of the worlds population and people?