Doctor Ben Carson stepped away from his social conservative supporters in order to back the establishment when he announced he supported the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
The TPP would weaken American companies and make illegal immigration into the United States even easier. Carson threw his support behind the TPP the day after the text of the agreement was placed online for all to see.
This is coming a while after Carson said he supported mandatory vaccinations without any exemptions. It seems that Carson is supporting more and more authoritarian schemes and seems confused about how he attained his position as a Republican candidate to begin with.
Find out more about Ben Carson’s policy ideas on page 2.
Ben Carson = Barrack Hussein Obama. Idiots.
To heel with both of’em.
NO,he’s not.
Been saying this for weeks
Is Cruz all for IMMIGRATION??????
It’s TRUMP!! OR BUST!!!
Is Ben Carson pro life? Not when it comes to the sick and elderly.
ASHINGTON — Does Ben Carson have a “death panels” problem?
Before he was a 2016 presidential candidate, Carson, a retired neurosurgeon, frequently raised questions about the high cost of end-of-life medical care — and asked whether patients should be able to pursue every available treatment. The statements touched on many of the most sensitive questions about care for the elderly.
“Do people just get to choose on their own, you know, ‘I’ve been, you know, completely devoid of any mental faculties for 10 years, but want to be kept alive regardless of anything that comes down the pike?’” Carson asked at a September 2004 meeting of the President’s Council on Bioethics.
When President Obama and congressional Democrats proposed five years later allowing Medicare to pay doctors to talk with elderly patients about their desires and expectations for end-of-life care, conservatives blasted them for trying to set up “death panels.”
But a STAT review of Carson’s statements — first as a member of President George W. Bush’s bioethics council and later in one of his books — found that the candidate in some ways went further than Obama in calling for society to carefully weigh the value of providing aggressive treatments for the gravely ill.
At a June 2004 meeting of the bioethics council, for instance, Carson wondered whether “we need to make a distinction between just using resources on people who are ill and using resources on people who are terminal.” He also noted in September 2005 that the ability to prolong the lives of the elderly has “significant implications in terms of population, and in terms of jobs for the next generation.”
While some of his remarks on end-of-life care have been previously reported, others have received no scrutiny — and could come back to hurt Carson with his base of Christian conservatives.
“They could provide a problem for him with pro-lifers if he doesn’t contextualize them,” said Richard Land, president of Southern Evangelical Seminary in Charlotte, N.C. “It’s one thing for individuals and families to make these decisions. It’s another thing for government to make them.
Well I found out…that His Adviser was the bestfriend of Farrakhan,and want to donate money to Muslim Farrakhan…. You should KICKED your adviser for he’s no good.
If Obama can’t kill Americans with bullets, vaccines is his alternative.
Hide and watch