Throughout his recent campaign for the Republican nod, accomplished neurosurgeon Ben Carson made no secret of the fact that he was a devout Christian. This fearless approach to his faith endeared him to conservatives, leading to him being one of the last candidates to concede the nomination to Donald Trump. It also set him apart from most politicians on the left, whose adherence to secularism leads them to sneer or condescend at best at public expressions of religious faith.
But according to Carson, at least one of Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s heroes antipathy towards religion led him to admire somebody much more sinister than today’s most vocal atheist activists. The man Carson spoke of was Saul Alinsky, and the somebody he admired was Lucifer.
Read more on the next page:
Hillary sold her soul a long time ago.
Again Ben Carson shows us that Trump needs to find him a cabinet job.
TRUE!!!!!!!!!! ALL THAT SUPPORT THAT EVIL FUCKING HILLARY ARE GOING TO HELL WERE THEY BELONG!!!!!!!
Alinskys political views were actually more aggressive than Hillers. She had a brief relationship with Alinsky and helped him write his book “rules for radicals”. $10 on ebay, you will see the inner workings of political science and why we will fall to communist Marxism under Clinton.
There’s your proof everyone!
@ Paula Elsey and @ Glenda Lee McCauley
Obama Invites 18.7 Mi llion Immigrants to Avoid Oath of Allegiance, Pledge to Defend America
It’s not only illegal aliens who are escaping enforcement of the nation’s immigration laws.
Under the Obama administration’s expansive interpretation of executive authority, legal immigrants seeking citizenship through the nation’s Naturalization process are now exempt from a key part of the Oath of Allegiance.
Immigrants seeking to become citizens no longer have to pledge to “bear arms on behalf of the United States.” They can opt out of that part of the Oath. Nor do they have to cite any specific religious belief that forbids them to perform military service.
According to the Naturalization Fact Sheet on the US Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) website, In the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015, the nation welcomed 729,995 Legal Permanent Residents into full citizenship.
• Over the past decade 6.6 million have been naturalized through a process that ends with the Oath of Allegiance.
• In the decade 1980-1990, the average number completing Naturalization was only 220,000 annually, but from 1990 to 2000 that number jumped to over 500,000 annually.
• 1,050,399 new citizens were welcomed in the year 2008.
• 18.7 million immigrants are eligible to eventually become citizens, and 8.8 million already meet the 5-year residency requirement.
The pledge to help defend America was good enough for the 6.6 million immigrants naturalized since 2005 and good enough for the over 15 million naturalized since 1980, but Obama’s appointees at the USCIS think that is too much to ask of the 18.7 million estimated legal immigrants eligible today for eventual naturalization or the 750,000 who will be naturalized in the coming year.
This radical change was announced a year ago, in July of 2015. Congress did not enact the change in new legislation. There was no congressional debate, no filibuster in the US Senate, and no sit-in in the House to demand that a bill to repeal the USCIS action be brought to a vote.
No, this radical change was implemented while Congress slept. Like other Obama actions to undermine our immigration laws, the Republican-controlled Congress has not used its constitutional powers to reverse the administrative action. Thank God many states are stepping up to fill that void.
This week, the US Supreme Court let stand a federal district court ruling invalidating Obama’s unconstitutional “DAPA” amnesty.
By a 4-4 tie vote, the Supreme Court declined to review the Circuit Court’s ruling upholding the Houston district court decision. Therefore, it is now the law and Obama’s DAPA amnesty is voided. If Justice Scalia were still alive and participating in the case, it would have been a 5-4 ruling because the “swing vote,” Associate Justice Kennedy, voted with Justices Alito, Roberts and Thomas.
Where was Congress? Why did it take a lawsuit by the Governors and Attorneys General of 26 states to overturn Obama’s unconstitutional actions?
It’s true that other Presidents have made changes in the Naturalization process by administrative decree and without congressional approval. In 2002, in the wake of the 9-11 terrorist attack, President George Bush by executive order expedited the naturalization process for 89,000 immigrants serving in the armed forces. While many will agree with Bush’s action and even applaud, that change should have been done by act of Congress, not a presidential executive order.
In fact, most Americans will think it extremely odd that the USCIS action with regard to the Oath of Allegiance is not illegal. But the fact is, unelected bureaucrats at the USCIS can change the wording of the Oath without approval of the people’s representatives in Congress. Strange as it sounds, the law as it stands today allows USCIS bureaucrats great leeway in managing the Naturalization process, so Obama’s actions will not be challenged in federal court.
Yet, in view of Obama’s actions, why doesn’t Congress change the law and take control of the Oath of Allegiance? So far, there is no indication that the Republican leadership will do so. If they won’t even bar Islamic terrorists from the refugee program, why should we expect them to protect the Oath of Allegiance? Some members of Congress will grumble, make speeches and issue press releases, but the Republican leadership will do nothing.
Such is the state of the nation as we approach this 240th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. Some Americans see great irony in the British declaring their independence from the tyranny of Brussels while Americans quietly accept the new tyranny of WDC.
Catholics and Lutherans, they’re in on it! All the major religions are involved in the resettlement. There
are 9 main major refugee resettlement organizations (Volags from
“Voluntary Agency”) with approximately 450 affiliated organization throughout the country; many are run by former refugees. Below are the 9
Volags that operate today:
US Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB),
Lutheran Immigrant Aid Society (LIRS),
International Rescue Committee (IRC),
World Relief Corporation,
Immigrant and Refugee Services of America (IRSA),
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS),
Church World Service (CWS),
Domestic and Foreign Missionary Service of the Episcopal Church of the USA,
Ethiopian Community Development Center (ECDC),
Below are some of the sources of income for Volags:
a. $1,850 per refugee (including children) from the State Department.
b. Up to $2,200 for each refugee by participating in a U.S. DHHS program known as Matching Grant. To get the $2,200, the Volag need only show i spent $200 and gave away $800 worth of donated clothes, furniture or cars.
c. The Volag pockets 25% of every transportation loan it collects from refugees it “sponsors”.
d. All Volag expenses and overhead in the Washington, DC HQ are paid by the U.S. government.
e. For their refugee programs, Volags collect money from all federal grant programs – “Marriage Initiative”, “Faith-based”,
“Ownership Society”, etc., as well as from various state and local grants.
The program is so lucrative that in some towns the Catholic Church has lessened support for traditional charity works to put more effort in resettlement. It uses collection offerings to promote the refugee resettlement program. https://refugeeresettlementwat…
72 House Democrats ask Obama to take in 100,000 Syrian refugees
A letter was sent to President Obama by 72 House Democrats on Friday asking the President to increase the amount of Syrian refugees the U.S. is taking in to 100,000.
They said that America has not done enough to resettle Syrians displaced by their civil war.
“The number of Syrian refugees that the United States has resettled since the start of the conflict- approximately 1,500- is insufficient in light of the current crisis,” the letter stated. Syrian refugees have positive views toward ISIS While they were pleased the president was increasing the number to 10,000, they thought that number was still too small especially considering the millions that Lebanon, Turkey, and Jordan have taken in. The letter, spearheaded by Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.), failed to mention that the gulf states like Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia have not taken in a single refugee. This is despite the fact that they speak the same language, in the same region, and a majority share the same faith. “It is our moral duty, as a nation founded on the principles of equality and freedom, to do what we can to assist our brethren who are in desperate turmoil, and are searching for the slightest gesture of goodwill,” the letter concluded. The U.S. already takes in 70% of the world’s refugees. Only Democrats would find logic in emptying Syria of the “moderate Muslims” and leave for extremists and ISIS.
le13u6b68x
0irdjtuiml
rj0tjmpd4u
http://8nj6cexnqvweo.com
http://lg097qvem0f46h4n4g.com
http://h3ji1b6bh1.com
[url=http://87zxq912yh6by.com]ow3ijpg6vj[/url]
[url=http://52idldzmmxat894.com]6vtux16uyi[/url]
[url=http://zj5mknnkiyhvwi.com]3h8su8pfqu[/url]
f0lqqdsn66
9zzlbchikc
ivzbltp4sv
http://s0raqcrp.com
http://26516tibb86l62j6v14.com
http://cri7nnsz6sm1l.com
[url=http://u3o2rw604ql.com]9yoqmumus6[/url]
[url=http://ivvdwfxhlp5c62pwnj86.com]oh8i9sjy2l[/url]
[url=http://k04rbxkq94v9wqkgv5hq.com]wazy07yydq[/url]
Tennessee, Georgia,Texas,America or the World of your Politics does not feel that they are going to be Caught they are More Corrupt or Better than Michigan.
WRONG! Michigan IS getting CAUGHT as well as YOU WILL!