The BBC is so loath to discuss Islam or even terrorism that it is seriously considering barring usage of either in its publications.
As part of it’s efforts to distract citizens from the very real threat posed by Islamic jihadists, leftists on both sides of the Atlantic have insisted that the issue of terrorism has nothing to do with Islam, even when terrorists explicitly give religious justifications for their crimes. In the US, no one more exemplifies this reluctance to name the problem more than President Obama, who has made it a point to refuse to use the term “radical Islamic terrorism.”
In the UK, however, it is the BBC that is leading the charge against calling a spade a spade. Posting on it’s Radio Scotland Twitter account, the British media outlet asked users whether it should remove the phrases “Islamist” and “terrorist” from it’s publications or if they accurately describe the acts in question.
Turn to the next page for more info:
No…
Winston Churchill hasn’t stopped laughing.
Wow…. no words… just none…
no
COWARDS (BBC).
no
I am sick of the liberal BBC!
So what word would you use then?
Wait till they bomb this building and murder a few Goyim..
When you identify a problem, you specify as much as possible. That is if you intend to actually solve it, and not prolong it. Islamist, works just fine.The radical-terrorist part is implied and known to anyone educated, on the matter already.