The BBC is so loath to discuss Islam or even terrorism that it is seriously considering barring usage of either in its publications.
As part of it’s efforts to distract citizens from the very real threat posed by Islamic jihadists, leftists on both sides of the Atlantic have insisted that the issue of terrorism has nothing to do with Islam, even when terrorists explicitly give religious justifications for their crimes. In the US, no one more exemplifies this reluctance to name the problem more than President Obama, who has made it a point to refuse to use the term “radical Islamic terrorism.”
In the UK, however, it is the BBC that is leading the charge against calling a spade a spade. Posting on it’s Radio Scotland Twitter account, the British media outlet asked users whether it should remove the phrases “Islamist” and “terrorist” from it’s publications or if they accurately describe the acts in question.
Turn to the next page for more info:
No , you could change it to radical Islamic killers and global murderers.
I dont believe the media anymore
forget politically correctness the words terrorist islamic is speaking the truth it is not sugar coating muslim terrorist who are hell bent destroying the world by removing anything being the truth is like hiding and giving permission for terrorist to do what they do which is destruction SUGAR COATING THE BLOODY truth means people will lose their fear and say the terrorist are misunderstood wayward souls….. no they are muslim terrorist aways has been always will be
SCREW YOU
Remove Islam and then you can print anything you want.
Yes, let’s just call them ignorant, backward mean people who want to kill us. Is that better.
Censorship is the first step of socialism the liberals are more like$#%&!@*then anybody they accuse of being one
What s stupid question !! You call it what it is !!
Heck no…why should we just because obozo is afraid to use it?
If the shoe fits, leave it.