The BBC is so loath to discuss Islam or even terrorism that it is seriously considering barring usage of either in its publications.
As part of it’s efforts to distract citizens from the very real threat posed by Islamic jihadists, leftists on both sides of the Atlantic have insisted that the issue of terrorism has nothing to do with Islam, even when terrorists explicitly give religious justifications for their crimes. In the US, no one more exemplifies this reluctance to name the problem more than President Obama, who has made it a point to refuse to use the term “radical Islamic terrorism.”
In the UK, however, it is the BBC that is leading the charge against calling a spade a spade. Posting on it’s Radio Scotland Twitter account, the British media outlet asked users whether it should remove the phrases “Islamist” and “terrorist” from it’s publications or if they accurately describe the acts in question.
Turn to the next page for more info:
We need to say it like it is – Radical Islamic Terrorism.
No, they are the problem, why would you want to be like obama and hide it?
Why are we so afraid of offending those whose greatest delight is in taking offense? Call a spade a$#%&!@*spade!
You may remove BBC if you do that.
ONLY A COMPLETE STUPID IGNORANT FOOL WOULD ASK THAT QUESTION. ARE YOU PRINTING THE NEWS, OR ARE YOU PRINTING P.C. EXTREMIST LYING B******T? BBC YOU ARE A VERY SICK ORGANIZATION. YOU SHOULD BE OUT OF BUSINESS.
How bout shutting down d I wn
All newspapers.
No, call it what it is.
Hell no!
You have to be kidding. How stupid are these idiots? They are what they are. If you change the name do you think they will suddenly become peaceful. I guess that is how ignorant you are.
No