The BBC is so loath to discuss Islam or even terrorism that it is seriously considering barring usage of either in its publications.
As part of it’s efforts to distract citizens from the very real threat posed by Islamic jihadists, leftists on both sides of the Atlantic have insisted that the issue of terrorism has nothing to do with Islam, even when terrorists explicitly give religious justifications for their crimes. In the US, no one more exemplifies this reluctance to name the problem more than President Obama, who has made it a point to refuse to use the term “radical Islamic terrorism.”
In the UK, however, it is the BBC that is leading the charge against calling a spade a spade. Posting on it’s Radio Scotland Twitter account, the British media outlet asked users whether it should remove the phrases “Islamist” and “terrorist” from it’s publications or if they accurately describe the acts in question.
Turn to the next page for more info:
NO
Why?????
What do you think Douglas, this is one of your sources…
We don’t give a$#%&!@*what you do…we don’t read that b******t you print anyway…we communicate news in other ways…catch up….
No you dummys
Cowards , just raise the white flag and surrender the country .
No
What the$#%&!@*is this? Why are we changing definitions our removing words?
An retard is not ” mentally dimished ” a dwarf it’s now a ” little person” etc…
WHY? For fucks sake. Don’t tell me$#%&!@*is chocolate
You can if you want to. Don’t ask US to
No. Call it what it is