The BBC is so loath to discuss Islam or even terrorism that it is seriously considering barring usage of either in its publications.
As part of it’s efforts to distract citizens from the very real threat posed by Islamic jihadists, leftists on both sides of the Atlantic have insisted that the issue of terrorism has nothing to do with Islam, even when terrorists explicitly give religious justifications for their crimes. In the US, no one more exemplifies this reluctance to name the problem more than President Obama, who has made it a point to refuse to use the term “radical Islamic terrorism.”
In the UK, however, it is the BBC that is leading the charge against calling a spade a spade. Posting on it’s Radio Scotland Twitter account, the British media outlet asked users whether it should remove the phrases “Islamist” and “terrorist” from it’s publications or if they accurately describe the acts in question.
Turn to the next page for more info:
Yes, but make it a package deal – remove what’s left of your balls too, you friggin cowards.
Use them together
In alphabetical order
NO because that’s what they are
remove the newspapers
Cowards!
While your at it remove every word there then close your paper down.
Guttless Turds
As long as they are around, refer to them as what they are. If I wanted to give a racist comment, I would say call a spade a spade, but proper reference to them is ethnic.
YES, by all means. BUT you MUST replace them with MURDERERS , RAPIST, THIEVES, COWARDS, CHILD MOLESTERS ETC. ETC. ETC. GET the picture?